应用血管内超声指导冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗
作者:
作者单位:

(成都市第二人民医院心内科,四川省成都市 610017)

作者简介:

郑庆昆,硕士,副主任医师,从事冠心病的介入诊疗及流行病学研究,E-mail为zqk_971607@163.com。通信作者黄晓波,硕士,副主任医师,从事高血压、冠心病的临床及流行病学研究,E-mail为drhuangxiaobo@126.com。

基金项目:

四川省卫健委普及应用项目(17PJ023)


Intravascular ultrasound guided interventional therapy for borderline coronary lesions in patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Cardiology, Second People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的 探讨应用血管内超声(IVUS)检查与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)方法在冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗中的应用价值。方法 选择经冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查显示冠状动脉狭窄程度在40%~70%的临界病变患者60例,根据检查方法不同将患者分为QCA组和IVUS组,分别应用QCA和IVUS测量两组病变血管的参考管腔直径、最小管腔直径、直径狭窄率、管腔面积狭窄率及最小管腔面积并进行比较。比较观察两组患者住院期间、随访1月、6月和12月的主要不良心血管事件(再发心绞痛、心肌梗死、靶病变再次冠状动脉成形术、死亡)的发生情况。结果 IVUS组冠状动脉的管腔直径狭窄率[(57.80%±8.18%)比(51.73%±7.91%)]及面积狭窄率[(67.01%±10.41%)比(57.07%±10.71%)]均高于QCA组(P<0.05),而最小管腔面积[(3.90±0.79) mm2比(4.14±0.60) mm2]则低于QCA组(P<0.05)。住院期间两组患者均无主要不良心血管事件发生,但自随访第1月开始至12月随访结束,IVUS组的主要不良心血管事件发生率显著低于QCA组(7.7%比26.7%,P<0.05)。结论 IVUS检查与QCA相比对冠状动脉临界病变检测出的狭窄率更显著,并能更有效地发现“不稳定性”病变并指导冠状动脉临界病变支架的植入,减低心血管事件发生,改善预后。

    Abstract:

    Aim To explore the value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in the interventional therapy of borderline coronary lesions. Methods 60 patients with borderline coronary lesions(coronary artery stenosis between 40%~70% confirmed by coronary angiography (CAG)) were enrolled. They were divided into QCA group(n=30, received QCA examination after CAG) and IVUS group (n=30, received IVUS detection after CAG). QCA and IVUS quantitative analysis were used to measure difference in reference vessel diameter, minimal lumen diameter, minimal lumen area, stenotic rates of diameter and area between two groups, and qualitative analysis was used to detect coronary plaques imaging morphology with IVUS. Finally, all the patients were followed up for 12 months. Incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during admission and follow-up were compared between two groups. Results Compared with QCA group, the ratio of lumen diameter stenosis ((57.80%±8.18%) vs (51.73%±7.91%)) and area stenosis ((67.01%±10.41%) vs (57.07%±10.71%)) were increased, while the ratio of minimum lumen area ((3.90±0.79) mm2 vs (4.14±0.60) mm2) was decreased in IVUS group (P<0.05). Meanwhile there was no MACE during admission in two groups, but the incidence rate of MACE was significantly lower in IVUS group than that in QCA group since one month after follow-up started(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with QCA, IVUS can detect more severe stenosis rate of angiographical borderline lesions, more effectively detect “unstable” lesions, guide percutaneous coronary intervention of borderline lesion, reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events, and improve the prognosis.

    参考文献
    [1] Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno A, et al.Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CYIT-DEFER registry.Cadiovasc Interv Ther, 4,9(2):300-308.
    [2] Claessen BE, Maehara A, Fahy M, et al.Plaque composition by intravascular ultrasound and distal embolization after percutaneous coronary intervention.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2,5:S111-S118.
    [3] Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al.Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings:importance of lumen dimensions.Circulation, 9,0(4):256-261.
    [4] Nishioka T, Amanullah AM, Luo H, et al.Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity.J Am Coll Cardiol, 9,3:1870-1878.
    [5] Koskinas KC, Nakamura M, Rber L, et al.Current use of intracoronary imaging in interventional practice:results of a European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Interventions and Therapeutics (CVIT) clinical practice survey.Euro Intervention, 8,4(4):e475-e484.
    [6] Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V, et al.Coronary plaque disruption.Circulation, 5,2:657-671.
    [7] Kawasaki M, Sano K, Okubo M, et al.Volumetric quantitative analysis of tissue characteristics of coronary plaques after statin therapy using three-dimensional integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound.J Am Coll Cardiol, 5,5:1946-1953.
    [8] Magni V, Chieffo A, Colombo A, et al.Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve:its use and abuse.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 9,3(4):441-448.
    [9] Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al.Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings:importance of lumen dimensions.Circulation, 9,0(3) :256-261.
    [10] Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Choi YH, et al.Impact of plaque components on no-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment in patients with acute coronary syndrome:a virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis.Eur Heart J, 1,2:2059-2066.
    [11] Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, et al.Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents:the Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) study.Circulation, 4,9:463-470.
    [12] Doh JH, Koo BK, Nam CW, et al.Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis:results from the prospective multicenter FIGURE-OUT (functional imaging criteria for guiding review of invasive coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary computed tomographic angiography) study.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 4,5:870-877.
    [13] 中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016).中华心血管病杂志, 6,4(5):382-400.
    [14] Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al.2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization:the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions(EAPCI).Eur Heart J, 4,5(37):2541-2619.
    [15] Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al.ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 5,9(3):e5-e23.
    [16] Fukunaga M, Fujii K, Mintz GS, et al.Distribution of pressure gradients along the left anterior descending artery in patients with angiographically normal arteries.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 9,0(1):1-8.
    引证文献
引用本文

郑庆昆,刘剑雄,黄晓波.应用血管内超声指导冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2020,28(9):789~793.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:384
  • 下载次数: 639
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-07
  • 最后修改日期:2020-01-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-10-28